A- de 1996
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara
✓Claimant Alirio Uribe Muñoz
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negativa por cosa juzgada constitucional
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se confirmó el auto suplicado, por el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad formulada por el accionante de la referencia contra el Art. 61 (parcial de la Ley 50 de 1990), toda vez que ha operado el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada constitucional con respecto a las decisiones de esta Corporación, y no hay lugar a emitir un nuevo pronunciamiento sobre la norma parcialmente acusada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- R E S U E L V E:
- CONFIRMAR el auto suplicado, por el cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad formulada por el ciudadano ALIRIO URIBE MUÑOZ contra el artículo 61 (parcial de la Ley 50 de 1990).
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.